Enzo Couacaud vs Kilian Feldbausch Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing recent second serve performance highlights that Couacaud has secured 41.89% of points on their second serve over the past six months, while Feldbausch stands closely with 40.43%. This metric often showcases a strong correlation with match prediction accuracy, suggesting Couacaud holds a slight edge in this particular aspect of their game.

When comparing return game statistics, Couacaud has been able to win 48.32% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Feldbausch has captured 45.45% in recent form. Additionally, first serve return success rates are 22.67% for Couacaud and 33.51% for Feldbausch, which can decisively indicate who might be favored in the head-to-head comparison of this match.

In situations of being under pressure, Couacaud demonstrates a capacity to withstand challenges by saving 53.68% of breakpoints, compared to Feldbausch's 45.66%. These figures are useful for in-game betting, as they suggest Couacaud's resilience under crucial moments.

Considering overall performance, Couacaud has achieved a match win rate of 54.17% over the last year with a record of 26 wins and 22 losses, while Feldbausch surpasses this with a 62.79% win rate and a 27-16 win-loss record. This provides a broader outlook on their competitive consistency.

When discussing surface preferences, Couacaud thrives on hard courts, boasting a 69% career win percentage, while struggling somewhat on grass, maintaining an even 50%. In contrast, Feldbausch excels on clay surfaces with a 59% win percentage, though finds balance on indoor hard courts with a 50% win rate.

Both players' levels of play relative to competition become apparent; Couacaud has predominantly competed in Challenger and ITF $10K events, securing 57.5% of his matches. Feldbausch, participating more in Futures, Satellites, and ITF tournaments, has an impressive 76.19% success rate. It's important to consider the tournament tiers when predicting favorites, as they reflect the quality of opposition and triumphs.

Opponent quality emphasizes that Couacaud has faced competitors averaging a rank of 282.92 over the preceding year, compared to Feldbausch encountering lower-ranked foes with an average rank of 427.7. This could signify Couacaud's adjustment to higher-ranking matches.

In terms of deciding set performance, which is pivotal for live match predictions, Couacaud has won 67% of such sets in the past year, overshadowing Feldbausch's 44%. This is crucial if the match enters a tightly contested final set.

Moreover, recent breakpoint conversion rates reveal Couacaud converting 32.1% of opportunities, whereas Feldbausch demonstrates a slightly stronger ability with a 37.82% conversion rate. Such statistics shape expectations in break-point scenarios during live matches.

Overall, given the statistics, Couacaud may possess a slight advantage in this matchup based on his ability to handle high-caliber opponents and perform under pressure, particularly when coupled with his success in deciding sets.